Posts Tagged ‘Alladi Venkatesh’

Gift Box: Including Social Objects in Internet of Things - April 6th, 2012

Moleskins and Pens

Photo courtesy of paulworthington

Congratulations to Vrishti Gulati who passed her M.S. advancement to candidacy exam today:

Title: Gift Box

Abstract: This paper highlights a research gap in the Internet of Things, i.e., the absence of particular categories of social objects that matter to non-technical everyday users. Social objects are existing physical objects that people bond with, are attached to, or that connect people to each other. We conducted a study, named Gift Box, to specifically look at the social aspects emerging within the Internet of Things (IoT). The study represents gifts, a specific category of social objects that connect people to each other, through pictures on a social media website. The study offers a simulated interaction with the Internet of Things, to identify social objects that matter to users. The study is a first step for users to include objects of their choice. Understanding user engagement and sociality supported within the IoT can lead to a more successfully accepted Internet of Things.

This paper has two contributions: Gift Box user study to identify social objects that matter to users, so that such objects can be included in the Internet of Things and a Technology spectrum for the Internet of Things to support consideration about the kind of objects, technology within the objects, and capability of user contribution to creation of the Internet of Things.

Committee:

  1. Dr. Donald Patterson (chair)
  2. Dr. Alfred Kobsa
  3. Dr. Melissa Mazmanian
  4. Dr. Bonnie Nardi
  5. Dr. Alladi Venkatesh

Great Job Vrishti!

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted: 4/6/12 6:49 pm UTC by Add Your Comment
GD Star Rating
loading...

Social Media Revolution - May 25th, 2010

From left, Butts, Patterson, Venkatesh and Goldberg dissect social media from the vantage points of their individual fields.

From a CalIT2 Interface article which posted in full here.

Is the social media revolution real, or just hyperbole?

UC Irvine professors from four disciplines – humanities, business, social sciences and computer science – weigh in on this hot topic. They are David Goldberg, professor of comparative literature and director of the UC Humanities Research Institute; Alladi Venkatesh, professor of management and associate director of CRITO (The Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations); Carter Butts, associate professor of sociology and director of the Networks, Computation and Social Dynamics Lab; and Donald Patterson, assistant professor of informatics and director of LUCI (Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing and Interaction).

Q. What are some of the negative implications?

Patterson: As social networks begin to encompass all of life, they bring with them many of the same problems that we have in real, or non-digital, life. I think the assumption that everyone on your social network is a “friend” will be tested. We’ll need to learn how to deal with the people who won’t stop talking, stand too close, creep us out, but whom we can’t just wholesale disconnect from because of social and professional obligations.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted: 5/25/10 4:03 pm UTC by Make the First Comment
GD Star Rating
loading...

Nithya Sambasivan Advances to Candidacy - March 3rd, 2010

Beneficiary User

Beneficiary User

Congratulations to Informatics Ph.D. Student Nithya Sambasivan for passing her advancement to candidacy exam!

Committee: Bonnie Nardi (chair), Ed Cutrell (Microsoft), Bill Maurer, Donald Patterson, Alladi Venkatesh

Intermediated Technology Use in Developing Communities

Abstract: We describe a prevalent mode of information access in low-income communities of the developing world intermediated interactions. They enable persons for whom technology is inaccessible due to non-literacy, lack of technology-operation skills, financial constraints and so on, to benefit from technologies through digitally skilled users thus, expanding the reach of technologies. Reporting the results of our ethnography in two urban slums of Bangalore, India, we present three distinct intermediated interactions: inputting intent into the device in proximate enabling, interpretation of device output in proximate translation, and both input of intent and interpretation of output in surrogate usage. We present some requirements and challenges in interface design of these interactions and explain how they are different from direct interactions. We then explain the broader effects of these interactions on low-income communities, and present some implications for design.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted: 3/3/10 10:34 am UTC by Make the First Comment
GD Star Rating
loading...